The run I asked for came back with three alarming lines:
lifeCycle=? privacy=? recording=? bound=NONE boundMatches=NO-BINDING
autoStart=unset autoStop=unset liveChatId=none | streamStatus=active
Every single broadcast field was empty, and the stream half was fine. That
combination is the tell: not a failed request, a wrong nesting level.
liveBroadcasts.list returns a LIST wrapper, so the broadcast is at items[0]. I
descended into items for the stream and read the response root for the
broadcast, so every lookup missed, and BoundMatches — handed a null it could
not distinguish from a real null — reported a confident NO-BINDING. The
diagnostic invented the bug it was written to find. Three lines of fabricated
alarm on the one run that was supposed to produce evidence.
Two fixes, and the second is the one that matters:
FirstItem() descends into items[0] for both halves, and returns default when
there is genuinely no item.
The line now prints boundMatches=unread when the broadcast could not be
read at all, so an absent parse degrades to "I don't know" instead of a
verdict. A diagnostic that guesses is worse than no diagnostic: this one
would have sent me off to rebuild a binding that may well be correct.
Test guards the regression: FirstItem_DescendsIntoTheListWrapper_AndReports-
AbsenceHonestly, including the empty-items and missing-items cases. Suite
390/390, 0 warnings.
Credit to the run for catching it. What it did establish, from the half that
worked: streamStatus goes ready -> active about 30s into the push. So the
ingest registers as active server-side, which combined with the 99MB muxed
yesterday means the stream half is verified healthy end to end. The broadcast
half needs one more run to say anything.
The logs answered the question and closed off a whole branch of investigation.
The long run: broadcast inserted 14:17:04.577, ffmpeg to
rtmp://a.rtmp.youtube.com/live2/5f6z-... at 14:17:05.686, and ffmpeg's own
muxing summary at 14:18:56.473 reads
video:101229KiB audio:1419KiB muxing overhead: 0.202949%
~99MB of real video plus audio over 112s, which is what 8000+128 kb/s is
supposed to produce. No socket error, no 4xx from ingest, no reconnect. And the
broadcast still never left `ready`; close-out 403'd invalidTransition again. The
8s run behaved the same way, so "YouTube needed longer" is disproven — 112s is
longer.
So the RTMP path is provably healthy. That is the finding worth keeping: it
kills the entire "the push is broken" theory, which is where this had been
heading for a week. The break is between ingest being accepted and the broadcast
being told to start.
Which puts the binding in frame, and the app was structurally blind to it.
Google documents contentDetails.boundStreamId and says enableAutoStart fires
"when you start streaming video on the bound live stream" — both valid on
insert, neither restricted against reusable streams. But the migration guide
also says a broadcast "is not bound to any streams at the time that it's
created", and the failure that produces is invisible from the RTMP side
precisely because a reusable stream will happily accept bytes for an unbound
broadcast. Ingest succeeding proves nothing.
Hence LogBroadcastDiagnosticsAsync, riding the existing health poll rather than
adding a timer. One greppable line: lifecycle status, privacy, recording,
boundStreamId *compared against the stream id we are actually pushing*
(BoundMatches: yes / MISMATCH / NO-BINDING / unknown), boundStreamLastUpdate-
TimeMs, autoStart/Stop, liveChatId presence, the stream's own streamStatus and
activeLiveChatId, and the CDN settings we declared.
Deliberately self-limiting: _broadcastSeenLive latches on live/liveStarting so
the diagnostic shouts only while the broadcast is stuck and goes quiet once it
is healthy. A permanent per-tick log line would be noise; this is the opposite.
One test, per the Good Dog rule: BroadcastBindingTests pins the matrix and
specifically pins `unknown` when there is no stream id to compare against, so a
missing expectation can never be misreported as a match — that is the failure
that would make this diagnostic lie.
Suite 387/387, 0 warnings.
gramps