ec6a5ca4660922caed528c5cad781b51452cc2ae
1
Commits
| Author | SHA1 | Message | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
cdf82f688d |
Read the first instrumented take: the judder did not reproduce, no element is slow
The measurement unit existed to name which of the six scene elements eats ~140ms per composite. The creator's Release recording (ty-20261016-1841-559-0002.mp4, 174.5s, 1920x1080@60) names none of them — the whole composite costs ~1ms: composites 301 per 5s = 60/s, every slot, 0 dropped, 0 stalls after warm-up avg render 1.0-1.1ms (worst 2.5ms) = ~7% of the 16.67ms budget parts "#5 HD Pro Webcam C920 0.4ms, #5 ... raster 0.2ms, backdrop 0.2ms" - the other four elements never reach the 0.1ms print floor C4 cache 151R/150H: half the ticks were a whole-frame BlockCopy webcam 30.0/s at the resolver, longest gap 50.0ms (one 60Hz frame of sampling phase, not a drop) the FILE 29.6 distinct webcam images/s, 82% of images held exactly 2 frames, longest hold 267ms (the healthy 30fps-in-60fps signature) The two stalls are not composite cost: 124ms on the very first render (warm-up) and 53ms entering the "Chat" scene (a rebake). So the historic slow numbers are not a slow scene but different configurations: - Oct 9 19:48 (only bad take still on disk) was the VERTICAL tier: "FramePump started (1080x1920 @ 60 fps) scene='Live' comp=608x1080" - the 607x1080 centre crop upscaled to 2M px, 92 renders/5s, avg render 45.0ms, worst 278ms. - Oct 5 12:01 (141ms) logged no scene=/comp= at all - the suffix did not exist yet, so the map's "21:9 -> 1920x803" explanation stays a hypothesis, not a reading. - Every slow window shows "cache xR/0H" (the whole-frame cache never reusing) while this take shows 151R/150H, and one Oct 5 take latches mid-take (1.5ms -> 3.0ms -> 45.2ms in 15s, then stays). That latch is the lead for the next take; it is a hypothesis and the parts line is what will decide it. Corrections to the map (same commit, stale facts replaced not appended): - "It was never Debug-vs-Release" is WITHDRAWN: same 1920x1080 tier, Oct 9 = 10.4ms vs this Release take's 1.0ms, and Build <hash> carries no configuration - every pre-2026-10-16 render number is config-unknown. - The "same scene shape" 10:01/12:01 comparison is superseded: it was an eye comparison of takes whose geometry was never logged. New: scripts/webcam-cadence.py - the ground-truth probe for what the FILE holds, beside what the pump says it did. It took three wrong readings to get right (H.264 re-encoding defeats exact-pixel comparison; a round-clip crop's corners leak 60fps background; a fixed crop across a scene switch reads background), all recorded in MyMistakes.md as a recipe, including an ffmpeg-native cross-check (tblend=difference + signalstats.YAVG - the same metric, the technique already in this repo's A/V-sync recipe) which agreed: 52.2% duplicates / 28.6 distinct/s vs 50.7% / 29.6/s on different windows of the same take. Next: no fix is allowed yet - the creator makes a Release take in the failing geometry (vertical 1080p60 tier first), and that take's parts line names the stage. Docs in the same commit: ai.md (new "What the first instrumented take said" section, the two corrections, the parts-line denominators, the tool in the inventory), TASKS.md (reading outcome), HANDOFF.md (rewritten), MyMistakes.md (recipe). Gates: clean build 0 warnings, full suite 428/428, scope check passed. |