A composite splits into four horizontal row strips across four DEDICATED
background threads; the calling thread takes a strip too (so four workers
never mean five-way oversubscription), and anything under 64 rows runs
inline. BlitContentRaw, BlitBakedElement and BlitOverlay now fan out.
Output is byte-identical — strips already partitioned by row.
The demotion deliberately does NOT come from Parallel.For. The pool is
shared, so Thread.CurrentThread.Priority = BelowNormal inside it leaks
into every unrelated work item that thread later runs — a full test run
after trying it broke AudioPipelineTests.Mix_HonorsProviderGains_AndGameMute_
KillsTheLoopback. Established guidance agrees: use your own producer/consumer
queue with your own Threads and set their priority yourself
(https://stackoverflow.com/questions/524483/net-backgroundworker-objects-thread-priority,
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/1578599/c-sharp-lower-thread-priority-in-thread-pool).
Helpers/StripPool.cs is that queue. Four threads is the measured sweet
spot: fewer leaves render over budget, more steals cycles from the game
and the encoder and made render worse.
The scaled blit's column LUT moves from a shared static buffer to
ArrayPool<float>.Shared with a finally — a single static buffer is a data
race the moment strips run in parallel.
Gate: SceneCompositorTests.StripParallel_RepeatedRenders_AreByteIdentical —
8 renders of a scaled round webcam + mirrored image + master-sized flash over
a short backdrop must be byte-for-byte identical, and must differ from a
backdrop-only render so it cannot pass vacuously. It caught a loop-variable
capture (new Thread(() => Worker(i)) saw i == Workers) that crashed the test
host on the first run.
gramps
6b6284d05c