The run I asked for came back with three alarming lines:
lifeCycle=? privacy=? recording=? bound=NONE boundMatches=NO-BINDING
autoStart=unset autoStop=unset liveChatId=none | streamStatus=active
Every single broadcast field was empty, and the stream half was fine. That
combination is the tell: not a failed request, a wrong nesting level.
liveBroadcasts.list returns a LIST wrapper, so the broadcast is at items[0]. I
descended into items for the stream and read the response root for the
broadcast, so every lookup missed, and BoundMatches — handed a null it could
not distinguish from a real null — reported a confident NO-BINDING. The
diagnostic invented the bug it was written to find. Three lines of fabricated
alarm on the one run that was supposed to produce evidence.
Two fixes, and the second is the one that matters:
FirstItem() descends into items[0] for both halves, and returns default when
there is genuinely no item.
The line now prints boundMatches=unread when the broadcast could not be
read at all, so an absent parse degrades to "I don't know" instead of a
verdict. A diagnostic that guesses is worse than no diagnostic: this one
would have sent me off to rebuild a binding that may well be correct.
Test guards the regression: FirstItem_DescendsIntoTheListWrapper_AndReports-
AbsenceHonestly, including the empty-items and missing-items cases. Suite
390/390, 0 warnings.
Credit to the run for catching it. What it did establish, from the half that
worked: streamStatus goes ready -> active about 30s into the push. So the
ingest registers as active server-side, which combined with the 99MB muxed
yesterday means the stream half is verified healthy end to end. The broadcast
half needs one more run to say anything.
gramps
8fbc3701d2